Understanding the Mortgage Meltdown; What happened and Who's to Blame

-- End Ad Box --->Non-performing loans had a negative effect on the
People are losing their homes and many more will loseS&L's profitability which of course caused tighter
their jobs before the mortgage meltdown works itslending guidelines such as job stability and decent
way through the system.down payments in order for prospective home
To paraphrase Alan Greenspan's remarks on Marchbuyers to be approved for a mortgage. Way back
17th, 2008, “The current financial crisis in the US isthen, a home buyer had to actually save up enough
likely to be judged in retrospect as the mostmoney for a down payment 10 or even 20% before
wrenching since the end of the Second World War.a bank would ever consider underwriting a mortgage.
The crisis will leave many casualties.”The checks & balances kept banks solvent and
How many casualties? Experts are predicting that inborrowers responsible. Although this approach
the next few years, between 15 and 20 millionworked, some cried foul stating that the regulated
homeowners could have homes worth less thansystem was racist and discriminatory-and there
what they owe. Walking away from a bad situationcertainly was some truth to this. Skipping forward to
may actually make sense for people who mortgagesthe present, banks made a bundle on mortgages
that are 'upside down' considering the fact thatover the past five or six years. For the most part,
refinancing is out of the question and home equity isthey allowed their underwriting criteria to be
nonexistent.stretched so far out of alignment that almost anyone
It seems quite easy to point fingers at greedy Wallcould and indeed did, qualify for a mortgage despite
Street titans for causing the sub-prime mortgagetheir ability to pay. Some folks even applied for and
crises. They after all, put together the deals thatreceived mortgages for more than the property was
allowed banks to underwrite mortgages and thenworth. Sometimes for as much as 25% more than
offload these liabilities to investors. What many fail totheir property was worth!
realize is that there is no shortage of blame to goUnder the prior system, 125% mortgages would not
around from homeowners buying more home thanhave been possible because of course these loans
they could afford to real estate agents looking forwere held on the banks' books and could have led to
more commission dollars. Mortgage brokers andlosses that would have had to have been absorbed
bankers, the banks themselves, ratings agencies suchdirectly by the bank.
as Moody's and Standard & Poor's, Wall Street, theSo what went wrong? Under the current system,
Fed and last but certainly not least, the Federalthese loans were sold to the big Wall Street
Government.investment firms who repackaged them as
Let's start with the homeowners--the people whocollateralized mortgage obligations (CMO's), Mortgage
are now in the process or soon to enter the process,Backed Securities (MBS's) and other similar acronyms.
of losing their homes. Some of these people hadThese instruments were then sent to the ratings
never before owned a home and as such, may notagencies for their blessing and more importantly a
have been prepared for the costs associated withletter rating. Many of these structured finance deals
homeownership. Basic financial literacy is sorely lackingreceive AAA ratings-the highest ratings available
in this country despite there being no shortage ofmeaning that in theory, these instruments were least
budgeting and tracking programs readily available suchlikely to default. How does one create a 'triple A' or
as Quicken and Microsoft Money. The lack of financialAAA rated financial instrument out of sub-prime
literacy does not absolve these buyers of theirmortgages? Herein lies the magic. These Asset
responsibility. Every borrower receives a truth inBacked Securities (ABS) are made up of different
lending disclosure statement. Here is a portion oftranches or slices, each carrying a different risk and
what the act covers:reward level. The first dollar of principle and interest is
The purpose of TILA (Truth In Lending Act) is toapplied to the securities with the highest rating, and
promote the informed use of consumer credit bythe first dollar of loss is applied to the tranche with
requiring disclosures about its terms and cost. TILAthe lowest ratings. The lower slices are designed to
also gives consumers the right to cancel certain creditprovide a security blanket that in theory protects the
transactions that involve a lien on a consumer'shigher-rated securities. The investment banks that
principal dwelling, regulates certain credit cardpackage or 'structure' these securities in order to
practices, and provides a means for fair and timelyearn fat fees when they sell them to investors are
resolution of credit billing disputes. With the exceptionthe same entities that pay the ratings agencies to
of certain high-cost mortgage loans, TILA does notrate these instruments. Clearly the possibility for
regulate the charges that may be imposed forconflict of interest is present. If investors and not
consumer credit. Rather, it requires a maximumthe investment banks that stand to rake in millions in
interest rate to be stated in variable-rate contractsfees were to pay for the rating, the potential for this
secured by the consumer's dwelling. It also imposesconflict of interest would be negated. Furthermore,
limitations on home equity plans that are subject tothe investment banks have a vested interest in
the requirements of Sec. 226.5b and mortgages thatconvincing the ratings agencies of the credit
are subject to the requirements of Sec. 226.32. Theworthiness of these securities.
regulation prohibits certain acts or practices inSo we've already pointed fingers at homeowners,
connection with credit secured by a consumer'ssome greedy, many more I suspect, naïve or
principal dwelling.uninformed, real estate agents-one out of more than
Much of the subprime mortgage crisis can be traced60 in my experience was a gem, mortgage brokers
directly back to variable-rate mortgages. As is clearly& bankers, banks, Wall Street and ratings agencies
stated above, “TILA does not regulate the chargeso who's left? The Federal Reserve and the
that may be imposed for consumer credit. Rather, itGovernment of course.
requires a maximum interest rate to be stated inThe Fed as its known is responsible of the country's
variable-rate contracts secured by the consumersmonetary policy and for supervision and regulation of
dwelling.” It also clearly states that TILA also givesbanks. This is the definition of the Fed's roles in their
consumers the right to cancel certain creditown words:
transactions that involve a lien on a consumer'sMonetary Policy
principal dwelling. One has to wonder whether or notThe Fed is best known for its role in making and
these homeowners:carrying out the country's monetary policy-that is, for
1. Bothered to read the truth in lending act disclosureinfluencing money and credit conditions in the
at all.economy in order to promote the goals of high
2. Understood what the truth in lending act disclosureemployment, sustainable growth, and stable prices.
meant.The long-term goal of the Fed's monetary policy is to
3. Chose to ignore the information printed clearly theensure that money and credit grow sufficiently to
truth in lending act disclosure.encourage non-inflationary economic expansion.
A number of months ago, just as the subprimeThe Fed cannot guarantee that our economy will
mortgage crisis was beginning to unfold, The Newgrow at a healthy pace, or that everyone will have a
York Daily News ran an article about a family in Newjob. The attainment of these goals depends on the
York City, who had bought a home and were nowdecisions of millions of people around the country.
faced with the prospect of foreclosure. The articleDecisions regarding how much to spend and how
was sympathetic to this family, highlighting the factmuch to save, how much to invest in acquiring skills
that they're living the American dream and that thisand education, how much to spend on new plant and
dream was about to come to an end. What I foundequipment, or how many hours a week to work may
to be distressing was the fact that clearly visible inbe some of them.
the photo that accompanied this sympathetic articleWhat the Fed can do, is create an environment that
was a very expensive flat screen television hangingis conducive to healthy economic growth. It does so
on the wall. Perhaps I'm naïve, but I can assureby pursuing a goal of price stability-that is, by trying
you that if I were faced with the prospect of losingto prevent inflation from becoming a problem.
my home and having my family put out on theInflation is defined as a sustained increase in prices
street, there is absolutely no way that I would stillover a period of time.
have that expensive television hanging on my wall. ItA stable level of prices is most conducive to
would have been one of the first things to be soldmaximum sustained output and employment. Also,
and some financial relief would be found bystable prices encourage saving and, indirectly, capital
jettisoning what I'm sure was the expensive cable bill.formation because it prevents the erosion of asset
Clearly the public needs easy access to financialvalues by unanticipated inflation.
literacy courses. Too bad we don't see the need toInflation causes many distortions in the market.
make this a mandatory course of study in ourInflation:
educational system.· hurts people with fixed income-when prices rise
Mortgage bankers and brokers have in the last fourconsumers cannot buy as much as they could
or five years been raking in cash by the bucket loadpreviously
in the form of commissions paid when mortgages· discourages savings
they've originated, close. Many of these people have· reduces economic growth because the economy
not needed to do much in the way of prospecting.needs a certain level of savings to finance
Instead, their phones have run off the hook asinvestments that boost economic growth
people have jumped on the homeownership and· makes it harder for businesses to plan-it is difficult
refinancing and take out extra cash bandwagon,to decide how much to produce, because businesses
despite their ability to pay for their home.can't predict the demand for their product at the
No-document loans were readily available without thehigher prices they will have to charge in order to
borrower having to produce documentation thatcover their costs
backed up their income. Clearly this practice can andBank Regulation & Supervision
indeed has, lead to substandard loan underwritingThe Fed is one of the several Government agencies
processes. Were some of these mortgage bankersthat share responsibility for ensuring the safety and
and brokers dishonest? Sure. Were all of themsoundness of our banking system. The Fed has
dishonest? I think not. To have a massive nationwideprimary responsibility for supervising bank holding
conspiracy, where thousands and thousands ofcompanies, financial holding companies,
people involved in the mortgage banking andstate-chartered banks that are members of the
mortgage brokering profession got together toFederal Reserve System, and the Edge Act and
create this situation is simply not feasible. Yes, someagreement corporations, through which U.S. banking
of the blame does belong with those in the mortgageorganizations operate abroad.
industry, but they were simply a small cog in theThe Fed and other agencies share the responsibility
huge machine that created this mess.of overseeing the operation of foreign banking
Let's discuss real estate agents. In 2007, we boughtorganizations in the United States. To insure that the
a home, and also sold a home. The agent we used tobanking system remains competitive and operates in
purchase our home was absolutely fantastic. In ourthe public interest, the Fed considers applications by
opinion, she went above and beyond to make ourbanks for mergers or to open new branches.
deal happen. She answered every phone call,The passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB) Act in
followed up on every concern and was the epitomeNovember 1999, was the culmination of a
of professionalism. We consider this individual to be amulti-decade effort to eliminate many of the
friend, and we have sent referrals her way that haverestrictions on the activities of banking organizations.
resulted in her earning additional commissions. We willSome of the main provisions of the GLB are:
continue to recommend her to all who ask or· Repeals the existing limitations on the ability of
mention that they'd like to buy or sell a home in ourbanks to affiliate with securities and insurance firms
area.· Creates a new organizational form that allows
The real estate agent, we used to sell our home,banking organizations to carry new powers. This new
could not have been more different. We got our oldentity called a "financial holding company," (FHC) and
home ready to sell prior to closing on our new home.its non-banking subsidiaries are allowed to engage in
We decided to list it as “For Sale by Owner.” Infinancial activities such as insurance and securities
the event that we didn't sell this home on our own, itunderwriting
was our intention to list it with an agent as soon asThe Fed's enlarged role as an umbrella supervisor of
we had closed on the purchase our new home.FHCs is similar to its role in supervising bank holding
Literally, from the day we put the sign in front of ourcompanies. The Federal Reserve Banks will supervise
home and listed it on a “For Sale by Owner”and regulate the FHCs while each affiliate is still
website we were inundated with phone calls fromoverseen by its traditional functional regulator.
real estate agents. We were told many lies and wereThe Fed has to delineate the financial relationship
constantly harassed; although we had already made itbetween a bank and other FHC affiliates. Its primary
quite clear to every agent who called, and theregoal is to establish barriers protecting depository
were more to 60 who did; that we were willing toinstitutions from the problems of a failing affiliate. To
pay half the commission-the same as they woulddo this efficiently the Fed has to ensure increased
have received had they sold another agent's listing.communication, cooperation, and coordination with
We also told every agent that called that we hadthe many supervisors of the more diversified FHCs.
already lined up an agent to sell our home in theThe Fed has access to data on risks across the
event that we chose to no longer sell it ourselves.entire organization, as well as information on the
Our deadline was the closing date of our new homefirm's management of those risks. Regulators will be
purchase. We did have an interested buyer whoin a position to evaluate and presumably act on risks
shortly after our closing date decided to keep lookingthat threaten the safety and soundness of the
so we listed our home with a local agent so that weinsured banks.
could concentrate on getting our new home readyIt would appear that the Fed has failed to curb
for our moving date at the end of the school year.housing inflation which played a role in this entire
This agent showed our home a maximum of twodebacle then made matters worse and in their
times and got an offer which we accepted. Weefforts or lack there of, to properly supervise
ended up getting $1,000 less than we had wanted inbanking institutions.
a declining Real Estate market. The agents who hadFinally the government, a.k.a. Uncle Sam, the big
called many times to harass us called our listing agentKahuna 10,000 pound elephant etc. Where do we
on a number of occasions and he lied telling thembegin? How about with: 'Where were they?'
that the house was under contract when in fact itIt now appears that after millions of horses are out
wasn't at that time-clearly a breach of our agent'sof the barn (some horses ran, others were
fiduciary duty. Quite frankly an ethical agent wouldforeclosed upon) the government wants to step in
have continued to show our home until closing in thewith a bailout to save the rest. While nobody wants
event that the deal fell through.to see people lose their homes, the question that
But wait, there's more. Our agent also acted as themust be raised is this: What about all those of us
buyer's mortgage broker. At the closing table, wewho were responsible? Those of us, who scrimped
learned that he had signed documents from theand saved up a decent down payment, bought
buyer stating that he (our agent) represented themless-house than we could afford and who live below
and we had signed documents stating that heour means? Many of us drive older cars and keep
represented us. We also learned that the buyer hadthem longer. We don't run out and buy the latest and
effectively put down approximately 2-3% of thegreatest at inflated prices, we watch, wait and
purchase price when financed closing costs werebudget.
factored into the equation. Their first mortgage hadWhen the World Trade Center was attacked, families
what we thought was a high fixed rate and theirwho decided not to sue received government
second mortgage came with a rate in excess ofpayouts and we certainly don't begrudge them as I'm
8.5%. Because the closing happened in August, literallysure that given the choice, they'd prefer to still have
in the midst of the first wave of the meltdown, iftheir loved-ones over the money. The problem, in
they didn't close on the day they did (August 31st,typical government fashion is that those who were
2007), Citibank wasn't going to extend their rate.responsible and had insurance policies in place
When my wife & I have bought houses in the past,received less than those who were irresponsible and
it had always been a very happy day. These peopledidn't plan ahead. I'm not talking about dishwashers at
looked absolutely shell-shocked at the closing table.Windows on the World and blue collar workers; I'm
I'm not convinced that they knew just how muchtalking about executives, traders and people who
their monthly payment was going to be until closingshould have known better.
day. We knew down to the penny well in advanceNow our government, the same government that
having budgeted and planned everything on asat by idly watching as this bubble got bigger and
spreadsheet. Were these people stupid or justbigger despite many warnings, wants to step in and
inexperienced and mislead by a greedy combinationbailout people who are in danger of losing their
of real estate agent & mortgage broker? I'mhomes. There has been no talk about educating
extremely confident that they are intelligent peoplepeople, let's not teach people to fish, rather, let's give
but inexperienced and taken advantage of by anthem a fish and bail them out once again at the
unscrupulous agent.expense of those who are responsible.
The banks are also culpable. Prior to bankClearly, by keeping the majority of the population
deregulation, Savings and Loans provided mortgagesfinancially ignorant, there is a lot of money to be
to home buyers and kept these loans on their books.made by the poverty industry.