Curious Employee Foils Corporate Credit Card Fraud Scam

MOLLY, THE ASSISTANT, Molly treasurer at XYZFirst, Jerry had sole authority over the credit card
Corp. in Miami, opened an e-mail from a formerfunction. He managed the corporate credit cards,
colleague who no longer worked for the organization.reviewed the delinquent accounts, had access to the
The e-mail read: "Hi Molly, there should be a refund ofemployee statements, and dealt with the bank's
$716 on my old corporate Visa card from the IPaccount managers. No one reviewed his work. As
Conference. I paid for, but did not attend, thesoon as accounts payable walked the checks down
conference and did not turn in the charge to XYZ forto his office, he had all he needed to perpetrate the
reimbursement. Can you have Visa issue a refundfraud.The second breakdown was that the accounts
check to me? Thanks very much for your help."Thepayable clerk walked the checks over to Jerry.
e-mail was from Jerry, a former XYZ executive whoAlthough not necessarily right, it is understandable
had been Molly's boss at one time. The messagethat accounts payable would not have the time to
seemed innocuous enough. Jerry had legitimatelyaudit Jerry's delinquency list. After all, accounts
charged a business conference to his corporate creditpayable was processing more than 1,000 checks per
card, but he had canceled his registration because heweek with a staff of six. However, it was
left the company. Therefore, he was due a refund.Itunacceptable for the clerk to deliver the check
would have been very easy for Molly to trust herdirectly to Jerry. The check should have gone from
former boss and get him the refund. Instead,accounts payable to the vendor. The vendor
because something didn't seem quite right, she choseinvoice--or delinquency data in this case--should have
to check on whether XYZ had already reimbursedcontained all of the pertinent information to allow
Jerry for the conference.To make this determination,accounts payable to appropriately route the
Molly accessed Jerry's corporate credit card recordscheck.XYZ decided to report Jerry to law
online and retrieved his expense reports from theenforcement. Although $88,000 is not a significant
accounts payable file room. The expense reportsamount of money for a $1 billion company, and the
confirmed that Jerry had not expensed thelegal fees and other costs might be high, the
conference fee, but when Molly looked at his creditcompany wanted to demonstrate to its employees
card statement, she saw a couple of odd items.First,that it would not tolerate fraud and would hold
the most recent statement indicated that the formerperpetrators accountable. Decisive and timely action
XYZ executive had made four payments to his creditsuch as this is critical to maintaining a sound control
card in one month. Second, the statement was twoenvironment.Not everyone is as diligent as Molly. The
pages long, and Molly knew that Jerry rarely traveledlesson she applied is an important one to teach
for business. She scanned the charges and notedoperations personnel: Take the time to check
that most of them were from local vendors. Inanything that doesn't seem right. Because she spent
addition, none of the items looked like businessa few minutes performing due diligence, Molly
charges. The charges included dinners at localuncovered an $88,000 fraud.Several symptoms may
restaurants, department and grocery store charges,have flagged the fraud. If internal auditing had been
and airline tickets for Jerry and his wife that Mollytesting the employee credit card charges, simply
knew were for their recent vacation.Out of curiosity,identifying the top 25 corporate card users and
Molly queried the company's checks online to see ifreviewing their charges would have flagged Jerry.
any of the payments made on Jerry's Visa accountTravel reimbursements of $88,000 in one year
matched the dollar amounts of checks written bycovers a lot of travel. Testing the accounts of the
XYZ. Sure enough, she found that all four paymentspeople with the most posted credits would have
made to Jerry's credit card that month equaledsimilarly flagged Jerry. Also, Jerry averaged three
amounts on checks that the company had written topayments a month on his credit card over the course
Visa. Molly increased the scope of her search andof a year, an unusual pattern that, if identified, should
observed that every payment posted to Jerry'shave been investigated.Testing the top 25 corporate
corporate credit card over the previous 12 monthscredit card users and searching for unusual patterns
was from a check written by the company. She alsoare the staples of any audit program that contains
noticed that of the $88,000 in charges on Jerry'stests designed to uncover fraud.LESSONS LEARNED*
card over that time frame, none was for businessEmployees should take the extra step. If employees
expenses.Molly printed copies of all of the checks andare presented with a transaction that they do not
noted that, although Visa was listed as the payee oncompletely understand, they should do what was
all of them, Jerry's corporate credit card accountgoing on so that it became clear to everyone that
number was handwritten on each check. MollyXYZ would not treat fraud lightly. what it takes to
approached the director of internal auditing as well asunderstand the transaction. Molly was one of the
Jerry's former manager and requested ancustodians of the organization's cash, so when
investigation into the matter.While working for XYZ,someone asked for money from the company, even
Jerry was in charge of making sure that thea trusted former boss, it was important for her to
organization paid delinquent balances on the corporateunderstand the nature of the transaction.* Segregate
credit cards of people who had left the company.duties. This is a concept that is drilled into the brains
XYZ had an arrangement with the credit cardof internal auditors ad nauseam, but it is not
company that it would guarantee payment fornecessarily communicated as often to operational
certain employees if those employees did not paymanagement. The organization's head treasurer, to
the balances on their accounts. Once a month, Jerrywhom Jerry reported, was an ex-auditor and
would provide accounts payable with a list ofex-controller, and therefore should have been aware
delinquent accounts on guaranteed cards, andof this control concept. However, during the course
accounts payable would cut the check to the creditof business, when times are good and everyone is
card company.However, on the bottom of everybusy, it is easy to overlook the fundamentals. Jerry
check request in Jerry's last year of employment, hehad too much control, and because accounts payable
had written, "Please deliver the check to me."trusted him, the clerks did not adhere to their own
Typically, accounts payable would mail the checkprocesses and send the check directly to the third
directly to the credit card company, but becauseparty.* Act quickly and decisively. Jerry was a
accounts payable knew that Jerry maintained along-time employee of" XYZ, and he was well-liked in
relationship with the credit card company, theythe organization. It would have been easy for the
adhered to his request and delivered the checks tocompany to ask Jerry to pay the money back and
him. When Jerry received a check, he would write hiscall it even. How ever, management and the board
own account number on the check, and the bankcalled for a full investigation, led by the internal audit
would apply the payment to Jerry's credit card.Jerrygroup that included outside consultants, legal counsel,
did not need to make sure that the delinquent creditand the district attorney. Management also decided
card owners listed on his spreadsheet paid theirto not keep it quiet; they let the finance and
balances, because he had fabricated the delinquencyaccounting organizations know what was going on so
list that he provided to accounts payable. In manythat it became clear to everyone that XYZ would
cases, the employees with the so-called delinquentnot treat fraud lightly.* Thieves can get greedy. In
balances had left the organization long before, andthis case, Jerry had already left the company. His
they had paid their balances in full beforefraud might have gone undetected if he had not
departing.So, where were the control breakdowns?returned for one last $716!